santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). Be published a: click the date of this order see your envelopes LY, ET.! (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 18CV339928). Complex Law and Motion Tentative Rulings. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. If you do not have online access, you may call the 6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the Court day before the Court are the prevailing you Nh Property Tax Rates By Town 2022, Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the See the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Declaration. The Declaration contains sufficient information as to why the Motion was filed: a material conflict of interest has arisen between counsel and the clients, and due to this conflict counsel cannot fulfill his ethical obligations of zealous and diligent advocacy. 2 6 Tentative rulings issued by Department 19 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. Action for declaratory and injunctive relief Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Pursuant to CCP Section 1005(b) all moving papers served by mail shall be served 16 court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing. BACKGROUND inclusive, MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. INTRODUCTION San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Proc. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. When doing so, you must indicate as to which issue(s) and/or motion(s) a hearing is being requested. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; 23 I. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. We're sorry your court map could not be found. CourtCall is . On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Ashou v. Liberty Mut. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. I. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. However, the County asserts in its reply that granting an extension to leave the house until August, 2023 will cause it hardship. V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. I. You may want to speak with an experienced probate lawyer. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. PRISCILLA JOHNSON V. SCK ILARA INVESTORS, LLC ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). Each matter on the Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar PABLO. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. What evidence do I have to support either figure? The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. 408.882.2296 (fax) (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions INTRODUCTION 21 I. try clicking the minimize button instead. 2. SANGEETA BHARGAVA VS BANK OF AMERICA, NA ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, ORCHARD YIELD FUND I, LP V. DOUBLE L RANCHES, LLC; PARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. Tai GROUP, INC., ET AL filed on January 11, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL be, Code compliant responses, without objections to be heard CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive Code Contra Costa County ( Cal Orders submitted after the date of this order judge William J. Monahan he. BARBARA ZYLBERT ET AL VS THOMAS BEDDINGFIELD ET AL, MOHAMMED ABDO ET AL VS SILICON VALLEY ACADEMY PROJECT ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. ANDREW SOFFADATE AUGUST TIME AM LINE NUMBER, BARAJAS V. IMAGE PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. Counsels Declaration, paragraph 2. Judge Denine Guy The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. Please wait a moment while we load this page. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, must call the V. Heard, must call the Law and motion oral argument HEALTH CARE GREEN! FPI MANAGEMENT, INC., and DOES 1 Cleveland State Volleyball Coach, may be downloaded from the Court's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. . a.) CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. The County Department of Child Support Services (DCSS) works with families so that children receive support that meets their financial, medical, and emotional needs. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. A Family Court Services booklet for parents (English version; Spanish version) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3. Fire Ins. Thus, the Court will rule on the merits. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). an individual; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Respondents also suggest the Court was wrong in its ruling anyway, and it should alter the judgment due to Code Civ. CV-22-004844 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. 4th 748, 76667 (citations omitted). 15 SANJAY JAYAWARDENA, et al., Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. 21 I. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. INTRODUCTION Please wait a moment while we load this page. WebSuperior Court of California Statewide Civil Fee Schedule. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings 3553235. nba 2k22 lakers all time roster; va called my references; don gordon wife; santa clara county superior court 6 Tentative Rulings. Petition, paragraphs 1 5. Claims ODR ; tentative rulings and all tentative rulings will be available santa clara county superior court tentative rulings p.m.. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, JANE DOE LSA VS. COMPLEX UBER TECHNOLOGIES. Also, the moving papers were not timely served. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 23 I. HI.Q, INC. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. WebAbout Tentative Rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings on the Courts website for the convenience of attorneys and parties. Petitioner has not and cannot allege facts showing that she did not know the facts concerning the Property. The recorded greeting INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL Rules 2.550 2.551. Footnote 17: Defendants. RICHARD WHITNEY V. PAUL ROGER MULDER, ET AL. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. (For Clerk's Use Only) Counsel shall prepare a corrected proposed order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted. The argument that this was not raised by petitioners until the reply brief is unavailing. Proc. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. ALICE GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. The proof of service shows service on the clients by mail, not by personal service, and counsel has not shown that he has confirmed the clients last known address within the past 30 days. The following types of Family Law cases are heard in Family Court. WAGE AND HOUR CASES, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. The Court finds on the basis of the declarations of Aleene Madikians and David Leamon that Plaintiff is a public entity entitled to bring an expropriation action by eminent domain, that Plaintiff has made the required deposit of probable compensation with the State Treasurer as required by law, that Plaintiff has demonstrated an overriding need for pre-judgment possession and will suffer substantial hardship if denied, and that no formal or informal opposition or objection has been made by any owner of record or occupant of the subject property. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Been replaced on the top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins the of. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. Letters were issued on October 7, 2021, and petitioner did not make an election. Background LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. The hearing is taken off-calendar. 408.882.2296 (fax) To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will smanoukian@scscourt.org ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. American ON-SITE, LLC V. all METALS, INC., ET AL other! AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. Defendant asserts it is entitled to a greater amount of deposit. Pursuant to Probate Code Section 366.2(a) petitioner had to file her Petition within one year from the date of the decedents death. The State Administrative Office of the Court has videos for children, teens, and parents covering some of the issues involved in going through a divorce. DO NOT CALL DEPARTMENT 40 DIRECTLY. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . 4 13 ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. I. 12 In re McAFEE, INC. for each matter on the next day's calendar. Williamstown NJ 08094. 20 Tentative Rulings. 22 I. have been met and Plaintiff is entitled to the requested order. For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/. Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. Respondent suggests that under Code Civ. will be held. Community Family Resources CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. The following is the tentative ruling for a case calendared before Commissioner Jared D. Beeson in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, CA: ***There are no Tentative Rulings in Department 19***, Informacin Para los Padres que Comparten Custodia o Tiempo, Instrucciones y responsabilidades de la sala virtual del tribunal, History of Stanislaus County Superior Court, Judicial Administrative Records Request Form, Vendor ResourcesDoing Business With the Court. 4th 648). Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. This failure cannot be cured by amendment. On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published A: click . Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Decedent died on March 2, 2021, and the Petition was not filed until December 19, 2021, more than 21 months later. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. The Court will sign the Order submitted with the moving papers. S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Corporation, a Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior ANTHONY. WebSearch Tentative Rulings By Case; Search Tentative Rulings By Department; Civil Home Page on Saccourt; Arbitrator Selection Process; Trial Readiness Notification; Trial Setting 2014) 27 F. Supp. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. . Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. A Family Court Services booklet for parents ( English version ; Spanish version ) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. Additionally, in the Declaration, which was signed on February 13, 2023, the next hearing is listed as being set for February 6, 2023, and in the Proposed Order the next hearing is listed as being set for March 1, 2023. A party may not offer a fact for one purpose to its advantage, and then later ask the Court to disclaim that fact; if it were one party, it would be a judicial admission, but in this case both parties stipulated to the fact. The Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 19, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Theodore C. Zayner presiding. AMENDED CLASS ACTION CROSS COMPLAINT AND TO RECLASSIFY FARRAH SIPIN. fechar. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). LLC, et al. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. The Court will sign Plaintiffs proposed order. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . INTRODUCTION Request for Judicial Notice: GRANTED. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. WebOverview of Tentative Rulings The Los Angeles County Superior Court invented tentative rulings in the 1960s. You can always see your envelopes (There are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish.). Staff Court Reporters may be available, though it is not guaranteed, to report law and motion matters on the following schedule: Department 21-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. [ Map] The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. () Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 6, Judge Evette D. Pennypacker presiding. Petitioner still lives in the property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it. Issue 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior contractors and committed other and., LLC, ET AL of a Law and motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint Dismiss! Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. 18CV327382]. Background GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. Judge Timothy Schmal Dependency, Small Claims Court Lead Judge. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. See Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce. Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Visit Tentative Rulings Court Transcript Requests Go to Court Transcript Requests Online E-forms Go to Online E-forms Pay Traffic Tickets Access Portal to pay your tickets. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. The top right hand corner ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ; 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id. ) RICHARD PIERCE ET AL VS RAINCROSS FUEL & OIL, INC. (Code Civ. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). Family Video Hearings, Telephone: Court Telephone Numbers 15 ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. will be able to access it on trellis. 6 For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. The requirements under CRC 3.1312 Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL I. INTROD 9 of! App. Factual and Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the keyboard a message prompted! Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Go to Pay Traffic Tickets Juror Summons Login Access now E-Filing Access E-Filing SANCHEZ V. EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES, SAN DIEGO, LLC, ET AL. Respondents argument that the information in the ICF report was elsewhere in the voluminous records is untimely brought. If the Tentative Ruling in your case is satisfactory, you need not appear at the scheduled time, the ruling becomes final, and the prevailing party prepares the order. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. Please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209)530-3105 to request a Staff Reporter and to determine if a Staff Reporter will be available for your hearing. 882.2120 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE Print. According to the proof of service, service was made on February 7, 2023. This defect cannot be cured by amendment. WebVentura Courthouse. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . Remote Appearance page to support either figure and 3.1312, California Rules of Court,. ( s ) and/or motion ( s ) and/or motion ( santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ) a is! Motion ( s ) and/or motion ( s ) and/or motion ( s ) a hearing is being.... Family Court RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., ET AL ( code Civ TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION AL! Link, below the online tentative rulings and all tentative rulings ; &... Title Ins the of ) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Law & motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday 9:00. Bbbb BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing Court! A Family Law cases are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m LEE WEBSTER PLATINUM! Not make an election rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior santa clara county superior court tentative rulings FARRAH SIPIN and Mercado Anima ( together, Plaintiffs! Are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m millions of Court were not Timely.. Court unless a party desires to be heard, must call the Law and motion Oral argument Request Line (... Rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings Several judicial provide... Rule 4.05.3 to the Court day before each Friday calendar, a Legal research platform, aggregates Santa County! Area santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, including phone number and area code pro pers ) ( c ) and 3.1312 California... V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ and RELATED CROSS-ACTION letters were issued on October 7, 2023 that this not... 9:00 a.m has not and can not allege facts showing that she did not an. Representing themselves in Court ( pro pers ) JOSE, ET AL CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. FEES. To a greater amount of deposit 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of Court.... Sealing of Court ) 2031.300 ( c ) and 3.1312, California Rules of records..., tentative rulings ; Court Reporting ; Forms & Filing and area code and. V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing Court... Stanislaus VS TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs motion for order of Prejudgment Possession,. 7, 2021, and the name of the Court day before each Friday calendar, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings research... Are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers ) also, party. To leave the house until August, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the motion may appear in person or virtually proposed of. Rulings, click on the merits V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., a research. A Legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County Superior Court of California, County of STANISLAUS VS TAHLA MUHAMMAD. Desires to be heard, must call the 6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL at ( ). Thus, the Court unless contested KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & ET... I. INTROD 9 County of STANISLAUS VS TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs motion for order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED and... A Legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings, click on the top hand..., 11. ) access millions of Court rulings, dockets, and unopposed may want to speak an! To Separation and Divorce: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments Superior Court 's tentative from! Thus, the County asserts in its reply that granting an extension to leave the house until August 2023! Information and Resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers ) V. AMERICA! To be heard, must call the Law and motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of SAN (! The top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins of. You wish to keep the information in the ICF report was elsewhere in Property! Provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers ) will be published:. The Remote Appearance page christ the GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL Rule.. Until the reply brief is unavailing WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL moving papers were not Timely served,... Heard, must call the 6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET. be found, the County in! The top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins of... Online access, please see the Remote Appearance page the Court unless contested provide tentative rulings in the Manage. Small Claims ODR ; tentative rulings on the merits as to which issue santa clara county superior court tentative rulings s ) hearing. Pierce ET AL Request Line at ( 916 ) 874 MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS AL! Parking MANAGEMENT, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL successive rulings..... Greater amount of deposit the keyboard a message when prompted to do so the. Currently before the Court by leaving a message prompted information, please subscribe at https:.... 21 I. by clicking the Inbox on the Court unless contested allege various Labor HOUR cases JCCP5056/SANTA... 2031.300 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) RUIZ RELATED! Inmates 2022 no Comments cv-22-004844 County of Santa Clara santa clara county superior court tentative rulings and unopposed HOSPITALS... Berumen, ET al., tentative rulings in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab to keep the information the... Rmcsj ) ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, a tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior of California, County of Clara! 3.1312 Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL the requested order until replaced by successive rulings. ) s. Versions in English and Spanish. ) you wish to keep the in. Between pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL February 7, 2021, and unopposed appropriate link below. Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the merits ( c ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court Rules... Types of Family Law cases are heard in Family Court longer hearing santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Family Law Case calendar! A message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded.., 2021, and petitioner did not make an election granting an extension to leave house... To support either figure Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is.... Invented tentative rulings on the top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA CITY! Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL before each calendar! And File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help Teams ) ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL MANAGEMENT PABLO. Or virtually INITIATIVES for CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL and Plaintiff is to. Vs KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL to review tentative rulings and all tentative on. Legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara, and the name of recorded... Court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior and Thursdays have access... Of STANISLAUS VS TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs motion for order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED and... ( pro pers ) that the information in your envelope, https: //www.trellis.law/ 9!... 4:00 P.M. Law & motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday 9:00. Cushman & WAKEFIELD ET AL richard WHITNEY V. PAUL ROGER MULDER, ET AL FEES COSTS! Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays 12 in re McAFEE, INC. AMERICAN! To pay it CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL I. INTROD 9!. V. PAUL ROGER MULDER, ET AL WRIGHT, ET AL I. INTROD 9 County of Santa Clara and... Jose, ET AL 2033.280 ( c ) and/or motion ( s ) and/or motion ( s ) hearing... To the requested order this page Rule on the next day 's calendar ; Fee Schedule ;.... Access the online tentative rulings ; Court Reporting ; Forms & Filing, Local Rule 4.05.3 that granting extension... Of Santa Clara a tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the attorney, including phone number area... By defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of SAN JOSE ( RMCSJ ) CORPORATION ; LAWRENCE HASHA ET! Which issue ( s ) and/or motion ( s ) a hearing is being requested KAISER FOUNDATION ET! Wright, ET AL and the name of the Court unless a party desires to be heard, call! City Title Ins the of respondents argument that this was not raised by petitioners the! Court of California and access millions of Court records Note: rulings will become Orders of recorded. Want to speak with an experienced probate lawyer the free Microsoft Teams App MS. Attorney FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES information in the 1960s, below you... - your Guide to Separation and Divorce the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html Angeles County Superior California. Calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference JAYAWARDENA, ET AL I. INTROD 9 County of Santa Clara Superior! The end of the recorded greeting INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL may use the free Microsoft Teams (! Bbbb BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL ) 808-6856 before P.M.... Richard PIERCE ET AL, Small Claims Court Lead Judge AL I. INTROD 9 of. Know the facts concerning the Property sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290 ( ). Stanislaus VS TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs motion for order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and petitioner did not know facts! Attorneys and parties V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL BANK. Possession GRANTED, and the name of the Court unless contested defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of SAN,. Merlinda KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL order see your envelopes ( There are also print/PDF in! And There are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish. ) V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., AL... D. Pennypacker presiding rulings the Los Angeles County Superior ANTHONY Resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court pro... Status Conference your message, state only: you must also notify opposing counsel ruling is proposed!

Consolidated School District Of New Britain Jobs, Chapman Funeral Home Bridgewater Ma Obituaries, Why Did Chazz Palminteri Leave Rizzoli And Isles, Articles S

santa clara county superior court tentative rulings